P&H: Compromise entered into by one accused with complainant does not by itself wipe out proceedings against another accused who was not a party to compromise.

punjab-haryana
⚖️ Order Date: 13 Aug 2026
Headnotes

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, S.319 — Summoning of additional accused — Power u/s 319 Cr.P.C. is discretionary and extraordinary and is to be exercised sparingly only where strong and cogent evidence comes on record during inquiry or trial showing the involvement of a person not already...

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, S.319 — Summoning of additional accused — Juvenile — Once the Court finds that person sought to be summoned was a juvenile on the date of occurrence, proper course is to send the matter to Juvenile Justice Board and initiate separate proceedings...

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, S.320 — Compounding of offence — Compromise entered into by one accused with complainant does not by itself wipe out proceedings against another accused who was not a party to compromise. (Para 13)


Facts of the Case

P&H: Compromise entered into by one accused with complainant does not by itself wipe out proceedings against another accused who was not a party to compromise.

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed a criminal revision petition filed by Harjit Singh and another, upholding an order that summoned them as additional accused in a case arising out of an alleged assault in SBS Nagar.

The case stemmed from FIR No. 70 of 2011, registered under Sections 307, 323 and 34 of the IPC. The complainant, Karam Singh, alleged that he and his son were attacked with weapons after a dispute over saplings planted in fields. During trial, the complainant entered the witness box and the prosecution moved an application under Section 319 CrPC to summon...

Login required to open full judgment PDF
Login to Access File